Knowledge…Shared…Multiplies
Do you know what a No Contest Clause in a will is? Do you know the purpose that such a clause serves? I recently had cause to explain to Jeffery (fictitious name) a few matters concerning the making of a will and the use of a no contest clause. I had been contacted by Norma, Jeffery’s common law wife. Jeffery had recently learned that he was terminally ill and he wanted to put matters right. Jeffery and Norma have been living as man and wife for over 40 years. They have no children of their own. However, Jeffery has two adult children from a previous relationship. Jeffery ended that previous relationship when his children were young and shortly thereafter he moved in with Norma. Jeffery’s two children grew up with him and Norma. Jeffery loved Norma deeply but he never formally married her because of his belief that ‘If it ent broke don’t fix it’.
After Jeffery’s children became adults they re-established their relationship with their biological mother. The biological mother of the children, not surprisingly, dislikes Norma intensely. Soon the now adult children took up the cause of their biological mother, became hostile to Norma and cut off all contact with her.
Jeffery owns a house and a plot of land in St. George’s. He inherited the property from his father and feels that the right thing to do is to leave it to his children. He wants the property to go to his children but he also wants to prevent them from kicking Norma out on the streets, should she survive him.
Life interest for Norma
I told Jeffery that it is important that he makes a will since without a will Norma would have no rights to the property. I explained to him that to protect Norma he can will the property to his children but subject to a life interest to Norma. The effect of such a clause in his will is that his children will not get the property immediately upon his death but only after Norma dies.
Executor & safe custody of will
Additionally, I pointed out to Jeffery that it is important that he chooses his executor carefully. He should appoint a strong person as his executor; one who would carry out his wishes. He should also ensure that his will is kept safely so that it would be available for the executor after he died. If the will cannot be found, it would be just as if Jeffery did not make a will. Norma would have no rights to the property and she could be kicked out by the children
Witnesses & No contest clause
I explained to Jeffery that he should not rule out the possibility that his children would seek to challenge the will. They could claim that he made the will when he was declared terminally ill and was not of his right mind.
I explained to Jeffery that it is important to carefully choose the witnesses in front of whom he executes his will. That given his medical condition, it would be good if one of the witnesses is a doctor who has attended to him over a period of time. If it becomes necessary, such a doctor can testify that he was of sound mind when he made the will.
Which now takes me to the no contest clause. This is a clause which issues a warning that anyone who challenges the will would forfeit their benefit under it and such benefit would go to some other designated person.
A no contest clause does not prevent a challenge to the will. Jeffery’s children may still challenge the will on the ground that he was not of sound mind when he made it. If they succeed then the entire will including the no contest clause will be invalid. However, if they challenge it, they better succeed because if they fail then the no contest clause would have the effect of depriving them of the house.
The no contest clause could therefore serve as a deterrent. The children have to carefully calculate and decide whether a desire to spite Norma is worth the risk of them losing everything. The presence of the no contest clause could have the effect of them deciding to just leave it alone: let Norma live in the property peacefully for the remainder of her life and wait to inherit the property after she dies. Which is exactly what Jeffery wants to achieve.
–Joseph Ewart Layne
This article is for general information purposes only. Its contents do not constitute legal advice. Before you act on any matter in this article, seek advice from an attorney-at-law.
Joseph Ewart Layne is the Principal of JEL Professional Solutions Inc. He is a graduate of Hugh Wooding Law School; he holds a LLB (Honours) and a LLM (Corporate & Commercial Law) from London University and a LLM (Legislative Drafting) from UWI, St. Augustine. He also holds a BSc. (First Class Honours) in Applied Accounting from Oxford Brookes University and is an ACCA Affiliate.
Contact
JEL PROFESSIONAL SOLUTIONS INC.
Richmond Hill St. George’s
P.O. Box 3889, Burns Point, St. George’s
E-mail: support@jelgrenada.com | josephlayne@jelgrenada.com
Web: jelgrenada.com
Phone: 1 (473) 440-7585 (w) | 1 (473) 458-5576(c)